Yahweh The Two Faced God Ebook Store
This book or what i ‘imagine’ this attack on “Yahweh” is like watching a spinning top. No one believes in a ‘top” when it sitting still but when it starts to SPIN (circulate) it draws out our fascination. I can recall someone (I wont mention any names) a non-believer (a has been carnival-barker who made it to the BIG TIME) in opposition to Yahweh saying “I pluck out HIS hairs, one by one. I haven’t read this book yet but FARRELL I got a few hunches that your standing there with a pair of giant tweezers in your hand, ha, ha!
Two Faced God
The Long wait is over! Yahweh The Two-Faced God: Theology, Terrorism, and Topology is now available on amazon.com as a kindle e-book. Keep it right here.
(yes, inadvertently RESURRECT YAHWEH by exposing the MATERIALITY of that Symbol?) I stumbled onto this while re-reading Baudrilard which might have some SLIGHT analogies to your book? (just a wild guess on my part?) Here’s the Paragraph: We are fascinated by Ramses as Renaissance Christians were by the American Indians, those ( human? ) beings who has never known the word of Christ. Thus, at the beginning of coloniza- tion, there was a moment of stupor and bewilderment before the very possibility of escaping the universal law of the Gospel. There were two possible responses: either admit that this Law was not universal, or exterminate the Indians to efface the evidence.
In general, one contented oneself with converting them, or even simply discovering them, which would suffice to slowly extermi- nate them. I’ll thrown in another further paragraph in this Baudrilard essay just for good measure? I am thinking American Hubris – Antoine the CANADIAN (?) over in CHINA would probably agree with this following paragraph: (although CANADA is guilty as sin too ) In the same way, Americans flatter themselves for having brought the population of Indians back to pre-Conquest levels.
Is Yahweh God The Father
One effaces everything and starts over. They even flatter them- selves for doing better, for exceeding the original number. This is presented as proof of the superiority of civilization: it will pro- duce more Indians than they themselves were able to do.
( With sinister derision, this overproduction is again a means of destroy- ing them: for Indian culture, like all tribal culture, rests on he limitation of the group and the refusal of any “unlimited” in- crease, as can be seen in Ishi’s case. In this way, their demographic “promotion” is just another step toward symbolic extermination. ) This is the 9th day in the year 2012 —– AND HAVE A NICE DAY every BODY! The book is also set for release VERY VERY soon through print-on-demand. It is in the final moments of the review process and when the authors give the printed version 2 thumbs up, it will be immediately available for orders. We, like many, prefer the readability of paper, the aesthetic feel of a book, etc., and this book was designed for our digital AND paper readers.
By the way, sometime ask Dr. Farrell to take a video shot of his note-taking process in books his notes are the most valuable part of his library. Hint rulers, multiple colors, etc.
This book or what i ‘imagine’ this attack on “Yahweh” is like watching a spinning top. No one believes in a ‘top” when it sitting still but when it starts to SPIN (circulate) it draws out our fascination. I can recall someone (I wont mention any names) a non-believer (a has been carnival-barker who made it to the BIG TIME) in opposition to Yahweh saying “I pluck out HIS hairs, one by one. I haven’t read this book yet but FARRELL I got a few hunches that your standing there with a pair of giant tweezers in your hand, ha, ha! (yes, inadvertently RESURRECT YAHWEH by exposing the MATERIALITY of that Symbol?) I stumbled onto this while re-reading Baudrilard which might have some SLIGHT analogies to your book? (just a wild guess on my part?) Here’s the Paragraph: We are fascinated by Ramses as Renaissance Christians were by the American Indians, those ( human? ) beings who has never known the word of Christ.
Thus, at the beginning of coloniza- tion, there was a moment of stupor and bewilderment before the very possibility of escaping the universal law of the Gospel. There were two possible responses: either admit that this Law was not universal, or exterminate the Indians to efface the evidence. In general, one contented oneself with converting them, or even simply discovering them, which would suffice to slowly extermi- nate them. I’ll thrown in another further paragraph in this Baudrilard essay just for good measure?
I am thinking American Hubris – Antoine the CANADIAN (?) over in CHINA would probably agree with this following paragraph: (although CANADA is guilty as sin too ) In the same way, Americans flatter themselves for having brought the population of Indians back to pre-Conquest levels. One effaces everything and starts over. They even flatter them- selves for doing better, for exceeding the original number. This is presented as proof of the superiority of civilization: it will pro- duce more Indians than they themselves were able to do. ( With sinister derision, this overproduction is again a means of destroy- ing them: for Indian culture, like all tribal culture, rests on he limitation of the group and the refusal of any “unlimited” in- crease, as can be seen in Ishi’s case.
In this way, their demographic “promotion” is just another step toward symbolic extermination. ) This is the 9th day in the year 2012 —– AND HAVE A NICE DAY every BODY!
The book is also set for release VERY VERY soon through print-on-demand. It is in the final moments of the review process and when the authors give the printed version 2 thumbs up, it will be immediately available for orders. We, like many, prefer the readability of paper, the aesthetic feel of a book, etc., and this book was designed for our digital AND paper readers. By the way, sometime ask Dr. Farrell to take a video shot of his note-taking process in books his notes are the most valuable part of his library. Hint rulers, multiple colors, etc.